home / openregs

treaties

Treaties submitted to the Senate (Congresses 89–119), with countries, index terms, and resolution text.

Data license: Public Domain (U.S. Government data) · Data source: Federal Register API & Regulations.gov API

29 rows where congress = 95 sorted by transmitted_date descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: number, title, topic, transmitted_date, countries, index_terms, resolution_text, transmitted_date (date), in_force_date (date)

congress 1

  • 95 · 29 ✖
id congress number title topic transmitted_date ▲ in_force_date countries index_terms resolution_text
95-26 95 26 CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF MILITARY OR ANY OTHER HOSTILE USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES International Law 1978-09-22T00:00:00Z     ENVIRONMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION, ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES, MILITARY OR ANY OTHER HOSTILE USE, PROHIBITION  
95-25 95 25 PROTOCOL AMENDING THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE HIGH SEAS FISHERIES ON THE NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN Fisheries and Wildlife 1978-06-05T00:00:00Z     FISHERIES, FISHERIES PROTOCOL, HIGH SEAS FISHERIES, NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN, NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN FISHERIES, PACIFIC OCEAN  
95-24 95 24 ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL I TO THE TREATY FOR THE PROHIBITION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN LATIN AMERICA Arms Control 1978-05-24T00:00:00Z 1981-11-23T00:00:00Z   ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL I, LATIN AMERICA, NUCLEAR, NUCLEAR WEAPONS, NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN LATIN AMERICA, PROHIBITION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS, TLATELOLCO, TREATY OF TLATELOLCO PROTOCOL  
95-23 95 23 TAX CONVENTION WITH MOROCCO Taxation 1978-05-02T00:00:00Z 1981-12-30T00:00:00Z Morocco INCOME TAX, MOROCCO, TAX, TAXATION  
95-22 95 22 TREATY WITH BOLIVIA ON THE EXECUTION OF PENAL SENTENCES Extradition and Criminal Assistance 1978-04-14T00:00:00Z   Bolivia BOLIVIA, EXECUTION OF PENAL SENTENCES, PENAL SENTENCES, PRISONERS, SENTENCES  
95-18 95 18 INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION Human Rights 1978-02-23T00:00:00Z     DISCRIMINATION, ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION, HUMAN RIGHTS, RACIAL DISCRIMINATION, UNITED NATIONS <!DOCTYPE html><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en"><head><meta name="dc:title" content="[103] TreatyRes. 23 for Treaty Doc. 95 - 18" /><meta name="Content-Encoding" content="ISO-8859-1" /><meta name="Content-Type" content="text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1" /><title>[103] TreatyRes. 23 for Treaty Doc. 95 - 18</title></head><body><p>TEXT OF RESOLUTION OF ADVICE ANC CONSENT TO RATIFICATION AS REPORTED BY THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS AND APPROVED BY THE SENATE: Resolved (two-thirds of the Senators present concurring therein), That the Senate advise and consent to the ratification of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 21, 1965 and signed on behalf of the United States on September 28, 1966 (Executive C, 95-2), subject to the following Reservations, Understanding, Declaration and Proviso: I. The Senate's advice and consent is subject to the following reservations: (1) That the Constitution and laws of the United States contain extensive protections of individual freedom of speech, expression and association. Accordingly, the United States does not accept any obligation under this Convention, in particular under Articles 4 and 7, to restrict those rights, through the adoption of legislation or any other measures, to the extent that they are protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States. (2) That the Constitution and laws of the United States establish extensive protections against discrimination, reaching significant areas of non-governmental activity. Individual privacy and freedom from governmental interference in private conduct, however, are also recognized as among the fundamental values which shape our free and democratic society. The United States understands that the identification of the rights protected under the Convention by reference in Article 1 to fields of "public life" reflects a similar distinction between spheres of public conduct that are customarily the su…
95-19 95 19 INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS Human Rights 1978-02-23T00:00:00Z     95-19, CULTURAL RIGHTS, ECONOMIC RIGHTS, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS, HUMAN RIGHTS, INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON HUMAN RIGHTS, RIGHTS, SOCIAL RIGHTS, T.DOC. 95-19, UNITED NATIONS  
95-20 95 20 INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS Human Rights 1978-02-23T00:00:00Z     CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS, CIVIL RIGHTS, HUMAN RIGHTS, INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON HUMAN RIGHTS, POLITICAL RIGHTS, RIGHTS, UNITED NATIONS <!DOCTYPE html><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en"><head><meta name="dc:title" content="[102] TreatyRes. 17 for Treaty Doc. 95 - 20" /><meta name="Content-Encoding" content="ISO-8859-1" /><meta name="Content-Type" content="text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1" /><title>[102] TreatyRes. 17 for Treaty Doc. 95 - 20</title></head><body><p>TEXT OF RESOLUTION OF ADVICE AND CONSENT TO RATIFICATION AS REPORTED BY THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS AND APPROVED BY THE SENATE: Resolved, (two-thirds of the Senators present concurring therein), That the Senate advise and consent to the ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 16, 1966, and signed on behalf of the United States on October 5, 1977, (Executive E, 95-2), subject to the following Reservations, Understandings, Declarations and Proviso: I. The Senate's advice and consent is subject to the following reservations: (1) That Article 20 does not authorize or require legislation or other action by the United States that would restrict the right of free speech and association protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States. (2) That the United States reserves the right, subject to its Constitutional constraints, to impose capital punishment on any person (other than a pregnant woman) duly convicted under existing or future laws permitting the imposition of capital punishment, including such punishment for crimes committed by persons below eighteen years of age. (3) That the United States considers itself bound by Article 7 to the extent that "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment" means the cruel and unusual treatment or punishment prohibited by the Fifth, Eighth and/or Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. (4) That because U.S. law generally applies to an offender the penalty in force at the time the offense was committed, the United States does not adhere to the third clause of paragraph 1 of Article 15. (5) Th…
95-21 95 21 AMERICAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Human Rights 1978-02-23T00:00:00Z     95-21, AMERICAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, HUMAN RIGHTS, INTER-AMERICAN, RIGHTS, T.DOC. 95-21  
95-17 95 17 AGREEMENT WITH THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY FOR THE APPLICATION OF SAFEGUARDS ON THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WITH PROTOCOL International Law and Organization 1978-02-09T00:00:00Z 1980-12-09T00:00:00Z   APPLICATION OF SAFEGUARDS, ATOMIC ENERGY, ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, NUCLEAR, NUCLEAR ACTIVITIES, SAFEGUARDS IN USA  
95-16 95 16 1977 INTERNATIONAL SUGAR AGREEMENT Commercial 1978-01-25T00:00:00Z     INTERNATIONAL SUGAR AGREEMENT, INTERNATIONAL SUGAR AGREEMENT, 1977, SUGAR, SUGAR AGREEMENT  
95-15 95 15 RECIPROCAL FISHERIES AGREEMENT WITH THE UNITED KINGDOM Fisheries and Wildlife 1977-10-07T00:00:00Z   United Kingdom FISHERIES, FISHERIES AGREEMENT, RECIPROCAL FISHERIES AGREEMENT, UNITED KINGDOM  
95-13 95 13 TIR CONVENTION Commercial 1977-07-26T00:00:00Z     CARNETS, CUSTOMS, CUSTOMS CONVENTION, INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT OF GOODS, REVISED CUSTOMS CONVENTION, TIR CARNETS, TRANSPORT OF GOODS  
95-12 95 12 1973 PROTOCOL RELATING TO INTERVENTION ON THE HIGH SEAS IN CASES OF MARINE POLLUTION BY SUBSTANCES OTHER THAN OIL Shipping and Marine Pollution 1977-07-25T00:00:00Z 1983-03-30T00:00:00Z   CASES OF MARINE POLLUTION, IMCO, INTERVENTION ON THE HIGH SEAS, MARINE POLLUTION, POLLUTION, POLLUTION OF SUBSTANCES OTHER THAN OIL, SHIPPING  
95-11 95 11 CONVENTION WITH THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY BIRDS AND THEIR ENVIRONMENT Fisheries and Wildlife 1977-07-18T00:00:00Z   U.S.S.R. (Soviet Union) BIRDS, CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY BIRDS, ENVIRONMENT, MIGRATORY BIRDS, MIGRATORY BIRDS AND THEIR ENVIRONMENT, UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS, USSR  
95-10 95 10 SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE 1975 TAX CONVENTION WITH THE UNITED KINGDOM Taxation 1977-06-06T00:00:00Z   United Kingdom INCOME TAX, SECOND PROTOCOL, TAX, TAX PROTOCOL, TAXATION, UNITED KINGDOM  
95-8 95 8 TREATY WITH CANADA ON THE EXECUTION OF PENAL SENTENCES Fisheries and Wildlife 1977-04-18T00:00:00Z   Canada CANADA, EXECUTION OF PENAL SENTENCES, PENAL SENTENCES, PRISONERS, SENTENCES  
95-9 95 9 EXTRADITION TREATY WITH FINLAND Extradition and Criminal Assistance 1977-04-18T00:00:00Z   Finland EXTRADITION, EXTRADITION TREATY, FINLAND  
95-7 95 7 PROTOCOL WITH CANADA TO AMEND THE CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION, PRESERVATION, AND EXTENSION OF THE SOCKEYE SALMON FISHERIES IN THE FRASER RIVER SYSTEM, AS AMENDED Fisheries and Wildlife 1977-03-31T00:00:00Z 1980-10-15T00:00:00Z Canada CANADA, CONSERVATION, FISHERIES, FRASER RIVER, FRASER RIVER SYSTEM, SALMON, SOCKEYE SALMON, SOCKEYE SALMON FISHERIES  
95-6 95 6 AGREEMENT WITH CANADA CONCERNING TRANSIT PIPELINES Commercial 1977-03-30T00:00:00Z   Canada CANADA, ENVIRONMENT, PIPELINES, TRANSIT PIPELINES  
95-5 95 5 INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE PREVENTION OF POLLUTION FROM SHIPS, WITH ANNEXES AND PROTOCOLS Shipping and Marine Pollution 1977-03-22T00:00:00Z   multilateral POLLUTION, POLLUTION FROM SHIPS, PREVENTION OF POLLUTION FROM SHIPS, SHIPPING  
95-4 95 4 TREATY WITH MEXICO ON THE EXECUTION OF PENAL SENTENCES Extradition and Criminal Assistance 1977-02-15T00:00:00Z   Mexico EXECUTION OF PENAL SENTENCES, MEXICO, PENAL SENTENCES, PRISONERS, SENTENCES  
95-3 95 3 INCOME TAX CONVENTION WITH THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES Taxation 1977-01-19T00:00:00Z 1982-10-16T00:00:00Z Philippines INCOME TAX, PHILIPPINES, TAX, TAXATION  
95-2-A 95 2 TWO RELATED PROTOCOLS TO THE CONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES RELATING TO INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR, AS AMENDED Aviation 1977-01-14T00:00:00Z     AVIATION, CARRIAGE BY AIR, CARRIAGE BY AIR PROTOCOLS, CARRIAGE BY AIR RULES, INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR, MONTREAL PROTOCOL NO. 3, MONTREAL PROTOCOL NO. 4, MONTREAL PROTOCOLS, UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES <!DOCTYPE html><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en"><head><meta name="dc:title" content="[101] TreatyRes. 11 for Treaty Doc. 95 - 2" /><meta name="Content-Encoding" content="ISO-8859-1" /><meta name="Content-Type" content="text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1" /><title>[101] TreatyRes. 11 for Treaty Doc. 95 - 2</title></head><body><p>TEXT OF RESOLUTION OF RATIFICATION AS REPORTED BY THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: Resolved, (two-thirds of the Senators present concurring therein), That the Senate advise and consent to the ratification of Additional Protocol No. 3 to Amend the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air, signed at Warsaw on October 12, 1929, as Amended by the Protocols done at The Hague, September 28, 1955, and at Guatemala City, March 8, 1971 (hereinafter, Montreal Protocol No. 3); and Montreal Protocol No. 4 to Amend the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air, signed at Warsaw on October 12, 1929 as Amended by the Protocol done at The Hague on September 8, 1955 (hereinafter Montreal Protocol No. 4), proved that: (1) the President shall not deposit the instruments of ratification for the United States until he has determined that a satisfactory supplemental compensation plan, as reviewed and approved by the Secretary of Transportation, will be in operation for the United States; and (2) the President shall give notice of denunciation of these protocols by the United States if, at any time after their entry into force for the United States, he determines that a satisfactory supplemental compensation plan, as periodically reviewed by the Secretary of Transportation in light of new economic or other relevant circumstances, is not in operation for the United States, or that the best interests of U.S. airline passengers are not otherwise served by continued adherence to these protocols by the United States; and (3) the U.S. Government shall continue actively to seek to negotiate higher limits…
95-2-B 95 2 TWO RELATED PROTOCOLS TO THE CONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES RELATING TO INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR, AS AMENDED Aviation 1977-01-14T00:00:00Z     AVIATION, CARRIAGE BY AIR, CARRIAGE BY AIR PROTOCOLS, CARRIAGE BY AIR RULES, INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR, MONTREAL PROTOCOL NO. 3, MONTREAL PROTOCOL NO. 4, MONTREAL PROTOCOLS, UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES <!DOCTYPE html><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en"><head><meta name="dc:title" content="[101] TreatyRes. 11 for Treaty Doc. 95 - 2" /><meta name="Content-Encoding" content="ISO-8859-1" /><meta name="Content-Type" content="text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1" /><title>[101] TreatyRes. 11 for Treaty Doc. 95 - 2</title></head><body><p>TEXT OF RESOLUTION OF RATIFICATION AS REPORTED BY THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: Resolved, (two-thirds of the Senators present concurring therein), That the Senate advise and consent to the ratification of Additional Protocol No. 3 to Amend the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air, signed at Warsaw on October 12, 1929, as Amended by the Protocols done at The Hague, September 28, 1955, and at Guatemala City, March 8, 1971 (hereinafter, Montreal Protocol No. 3); and Montreal Protocol No. 4 to Amend the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air, signed at Warsaw on October 12, 1929 as Amended by the Protocol done at The Hague on September 8, 1955 (hereinafter Montreal Protocol No. 4), proved that: (1) the President shall not deposit the instruments of ratification for the United States until he has determined that a satisfactory supplemental compensation plan, as reviewed and approved by the Secretary of Transportation, will be in operation for the United States; and (2) the President shall give notice of denunciation of these protocols by the United States if, at any time after their entry into force for the United States, he determines that a satisfactory supplemental compensation plan, as periodically reviewed by the Secretary of Transportation in light of new economic or other relevant circumstances, is not in operation for the United States, or that the best interests of U.S. airline passengers are not otherwise served by continued adherence to these protocols by the United States; and (3) the U.S. Government shall continue actively to seek to negotiate higher limits…
95-2 95 2 TWO RELATED PROTOCOLS TO THE CONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES RELATING TO INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR, AS AMENDED Aviation 1977-01-14T00:00:00Z     AVIATION, CARRIAGE BY AIR, CARRIAGE BY AIR PROTOCOLS, CARRIAGE BY AIR RULES, INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR, MONTREAL PROTOCOL NO. 3, MONTREAL PROTOCOL NO. 4, MONTREAL PROTOCOLS, UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES <!DOCTYPE html><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en"><head><meta name="dc:title" content="[101] TreatyRes. 11 for Treaty Doc. 95 - 2" /><meta name="Content-Encoding" content="ISO-8859-1" /><meta name="Content-Type" content="text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1" /><title>[101] TreatyRes. 11 for Treaty Doc. 95 - 2</title></head><body><p>TEXT OF RESOLUTION OF RATIFICATION AS REPORTED BY THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: Resolved, (two-thirds of the Senators present concurring therein), That the Senate advise and consent to the ratification of Additional Protocol No. 3 to Amend the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air, signed at Warsaw on October 12, 1929, as Amended by the Protocols done at The Hague, September 28, 1955, and at Guatemala City, March 8, 1971 (hereinafter, Montreal Protocol No. 3); and Montreal Protocol No. 4 to Amend the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air, signed at Warsaw on October 12, 1929 as Amended by the Protocol done at The Hague on September 8, 1955 (hereinafter Montreal Protocol No. 4), proved that: (1) the President shall not deposit the instruments of ratification for the United States until he has determined that a satisfactory supplemental compensation plan, as reviewed and approved by the Secretary of Transportation, will be in operation for the United States; and (2) the President shall give notice of denunciation of these protocols by the United States if, at any time after their entry into force for the United States, he determines that a satisfactory supplemental compensation plan, as periodically reviewed by the Secretary of Transportation in light of new economic or other relevant circumstances, is not in operation for the United States, or that the best interests of U.S. airline passengers are not otherwise served by continued adherence to these protocols by the United States; and (3) the U.S. Government shall continue actively to seek to negotiate higher limits…
95-1 95 1 PROTOCOL TO THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION Aviation 1977-01-11T00:00:00Z     AVIATION, CIVIL AVIATION, CIVIL AVIATION CONVENTION PROTOCOL, CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONL CIVIL AVIATION, INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION  
95-14-A 95 14              
95-14-B 95 14              

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE treaties (
    id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
    congress INTEGER,
    number INTEGER,
    title TEXT,
    topic TEXT,
    transmitted_date TEXT,
    in_force_date TEXT,
    countries TEXT,
    index_terms TEXT,
    resolution_text TEXT
);
CREATE INDEX idx_treaty_congress ON treaties(congress);
CREATE INDEX idx_treaty_date ON treaties(transmitted_date);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 152.615ms · Data license: Public Domain (U.S. Government data) · Data source: Federal Register API & Regulations.gov API