ig_reports: 3-year-exposure-privacy-act-protected-data-revealed-uspto-mismanagement-safeguarding

This data as json

report_id title date_issued report_number report_type agency_reviewed submitting_oig location description num_recommendations questioned_costs funds_for_better_use pdf_url detail_url
3-year-exposure-privacy-act-protected-data-revealed-uspto-mismanagement-safeguarding A 3-Year Exposure of Privacy Act-Protected Data Revealed USPTO Mismanagement in Safeguarding the Sensitive PII of Trademark Filers 2024-06-24 OIG-24-029-I Inspection / Evaluation Department of Commerce Department of Commerce OIG Agency-Wide The objective of our evaluation was to assess USPTO’s actions in response to the exposure of domicile addresses to determine whether USPTO complied with federal and U.S. Department of Commerce (the Department) information technology (IT) security standards.We found that USPTO mishandled the required reporting and notification to the affected trademark filers after domicile addresses had been exposed for 3 years. We also found that USPTO leadership allowed domicile addresses to remain publicly accessible after they were aware of the exposure, risking unauthorized disclosures in violation of the Privacy Act. Additionally, USPTO did not report that additional sensitive PII was exposed during the incident or notify the affected filers that additional data had been exposed. Lastly, the Department’s Chief Privacy Officer (CPO) did not assist USPTO in responding to this incident because of a lapse in the Department reporting process. See appendix B for a timeline of the events discussed in our findings.USPTO’s exposure of trademark filer data may not only reduce public confidence, but also may have equipped bad actors with additional data that could be used to defraud trademark holders. Bad actors could aggregate the pieces of exposed data to convincingly create official-looking USPTO correspondence or impersonate a filer’s attorney. Despite these risks, USPTO leadership did not comply with federal, departmental, and USPTO incident response reporting requirements and knowingly allowed domicile addresses to remain publicly accessible during incident mitigation. USPTO must improve its efforts in safeguarding trademark filers’ personal data to rebuild public trust and honor trademark holders’ privacy. 10 0 0 https://www.oversight.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/2024-06/OIG-24-029-ISECURED.pdf https://www.oversight.gov/reports/3-year-exposure-privacy-act-protected-data-revealed-uspto-mismanagement-safeguarding

Links from other tables