federal_register: 00-2111
Data license: Public Domain (U.S. Government data) · Data source: Federal Register API & Regulations.gov API
This data as json
| document_number | title | type | abstract | publication_date | pub_year | pub_month | html_url | pdf_url | agency_names | agency_ids | excerpts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 00-2111 | Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments | Uncategorized Document | EPA expressed concerns regarding potential water quality impacts from roads, increased logging, and entry into riparian buffers. EPA requested the Forest Service discuss these concerns in the FEIS. ERP No. D-BLM-G65071-NM Rating LO, Albuquerque Field Office Riparian and Aquatic Habitats Management, To Restore and Protect, Rio Puerco Resource Management Plan Amendment (RMPA), Cibola, Sandoval, McKinley, Rio Arriba, Bernalillo, Valencia and Santa Fe Counties, NM. Summary: Because the EIS is programmatic in content and the alternatives considered promote environmental enhancement, EPA has limited its review to insure that the DEIS meets the minimal administrative and procedural requirements established by the NEPA and CEQ Regulations and finds the DEIS to satisfy these requirements and takes no position on the preferred action or the alternatives. ERP No. D-BLM-G65073-NM Rating LO, Farmington Field Office Riparian and Aquatic Habitat Management, To Restore and Protect, Farmington Riparian and Aquatic Habitat Management Plan, San Juan, McKinley, Rio Arriba and Sandoval Counties, NM. Summary: Since the EIS is programmatic in content and the alternatives considered promote environmental enhancement, EPA Region 6 has limited its review to ensure that the DEIS meets the minimal administrative and procedural requirements established by NEPA and CEQ Regulations. EPA's limited review finds the DEIS to satisfy these requirements and takes no position on the preferred action or the alternatives. ERP No. D-FRC-F03007-00 Rating EO2, TriState Pipeline Project, Construction and Operation of Natural Gas Pipeline Facilities, Docket Nos.: CP99-61-000, CP99-62-000, CP99-63-000 and CP99-64-000, Presidential Permit, IL, IN and MI. Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections with the project. The issues raised include alternatives evaluation, waterbody crossings, sole source aquifer, wetland and woodland impacts and mitigation. ERP No. D-FRC-J05079-00 Rating EC2, Cabinet Gorge (No. 2058-014) and Noxon Rapids (No. 2075-014) Hydroelectric Project, Relicensing, MT and ID. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns regarding continuation of potential adverse impacts to bull trout, and bank and shoreline erosion and aquatic habitat degradation that results from project operations. EPA also believes further information is needed to explain why a minimum flow release from Noxon Rapids Dam was not recommended. EPA believes the USFWS recommended terms and conditions to protect the bull trout should be included as license conditions, and that corrective actions need to be developed to address bank and shoreline erosion problems. ERP No. D-NPS-H65007-KS Rating LO, Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve General Management Plan, Implementation, Flint Hills Region, Chase County, KS. Summary: EPA had a lack of objections to the proposed project. | 2000-01-31 | 2000 | 1 | https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2000/01/31/00-2111/environmental-impact-statements-and-regulations-availability-of-epa-comments | https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2000-01-31/pdf/00-2111.pdf | Environmental Protection Agency | 145 | EPA expressed concerns regarding potential water quality impacts from roads, increased logging, and entry into riparian buffers. EPA requested the Forest Service discuss these concerns in the FEIS. ERP No. D-BLM-G65071-NM Rating LO, Albuquerque Field... |