federal_register: 00-10675
Data license: Public Domain (U.S. Government data) · Data source: Federal Register API & Regulations.gov API
This data as json
| document_number | title | type | abstract | publication_date | pub_year | pub_month | html_url | pdf_url | agency_names | agency_ids | excerpts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 00-10675 | Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments | Notice | EPA supports project purpose and need, proposed helicopter logging, minimal new road construction, and proposed road decommissioning. EPA expressed concerns about inadequate information on weed control chemicals for the project area, and on the proposed monitoring program to identify impacts from implementation activities. EPA notes that the proposed action could impact drainages classified as water quality limited by the State of Montana and the proposed action should be consistent with the State's Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) development. ERP No. D-AFS-K65345-CA Rating EC2, Pendola Fire Restoration Project, Implementation, Tahoe National Forest, Downieville Ranger District, Yuba County, CA. Summary: EPA expressed concern that purpose and need is too narrowly drawn, and recommended that the Forest Service take additional steps to address cumulative watershed effects in the program area. ERP No. D-NPS-E61074-00 Rating EC2, Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, General Management Plan, Implementation, McCreary, KY and Fentress, Morgan, Pickett, and Scott Counties, TN. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concern due to lack of information concerning specifics on management plan implementation and enforcement, and mitigation for impacts to water quality. | 2000-04-28 | 2000 | 4 | https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2000/04/28/00-10675/environmental-impact-statements-and-regulations-availability-of-epa-comments | https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2000-04-28/pdf/00-10675.pdf | Environmental Protection Agency | 145 | EPA supports project purpose and need, proposed helicopter logging, minimal new road construction, and proposed road decommissioning. EPA expressed concerns about inadequate information on weed control chemicals for the project area, and on the... |