{"database": "openregs", "table": "crs_reports", "rows": [["R49485", "Amending the National Environmental Policy Act: Analysis of the SPEED Act (H.R. 4776)", "2026-10-09T04:00:00Z", "2026-10-15T14:08:35Z", "Active", "Reports", "Kristen Hite, Heather McPherron", "Environmental Review & Policy", "Congress has enacted and considered a variety of measures concerning various aspects of federal permitting processes. Certain activities that support the nation\u2019s economy and infrastructure, including energy production, transportation, and natural resource development, require one or more federal authorizations (e.g., license, permit, approval). Many federal permitting processes (e.g., issuing permits, licensing, or granting rights-of-way across federal lands) involve environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a74321 et seq.). NEPA establishes a common procedural framework for federal agencies to consider environmental impacts across various activities and projects\u2014including federal permitting authorizations\u2014but does not itself authorize projects. Instead, environmental review under NEPA generally informs agency decisions made pursuant to other statutory authorities, including those related to federal permitting.\nThe House of Representatives passed the Standardizing Permitting and Expediting Economic Development Act (SPEED Act; H.R. 4776) on December 18, 2025. H.R. 4776 proposes a number of changes to NEPA, some of which include modifying the current federal environmental review process as well as broader changes to federal permitting. The House Committee on Natural Resources reported that the stated purpose of H.R. 4776 is \u201cto amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to clarify ambiguous provisions and facilitate a more efficient, effective, and timely environmental review process.\u201d \nThe bill would revise, among other things, NEPA\u2019s purpose, the scope of environmental review, timing and coordination of other federal reviews, programmatic environmental documents, categorical exclusions, definitions, judicial review, and circumstances under which agencies may modify or revoke federal authorizations. In addition to amendments to the process for considering the environmental impacts of a proposed federal action, the bill would also incorporate some broader permitting-related requirements and deadlines into NEPA\u2019s statutory framework. \nMany of the NEPA amendments in H.R. 4776 would limit or place new deadlines on agencies in determining and analyzing the significance, scope, and alternatives of a proposed agency action. Some provisions would limit the circumstances under which environmental review is required or the environmental effects that agencies must consider, or would expand the extent to which agencies may rely on prior analyses. Others would address matters that are governed under separate authorities, such as deadlines for an agency to make a final permit decision and related procedures governing agency decisionmaking beyond the consideration of environmental impacts. The bill also contains provisions addressing the treatment reversibility of administrative decisions, among other matters.\nThe potential effects of these amendments may depend in part on how agencies implement them alongside other environmental considerations and permitting requirements. Some provisions could, among other things, reduce duplication of effort, concentrate the use of agency resources, or provide greater certainty regarding completed environmental documents and federal authorizations. Other provisions could raise implementation questions concerning, among other things, the information available for environmental analysis, coordination among agencies, interaction between new NEPA deadlines and requirements imposed by other statutes, and the availability and scope of judicial review. \nH.R. 4776 is one of several permitting reform proposals considered in the 119th Congress. Whereas H.R. 4776 would principally pursue permitting reform through amendments to NEPA, other proposals would address federal permitting through changes to authorization processes, project-specific permitting requirements, permitting technology and administration, or individual permitting statutes. A variety of stakeholders have expressed interest in improving the efficiency and predictability of federal permitting but often differ over whether and how NEPA should be amended to achieve those objectives. \n", "https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/R/PDF/R49485/R49485.2.pdf", "https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/R/HTML/R49485.html"]], "columns": ["id", "title", "publish_date", "update_date", "status", "content_type", "authors", "topics", "summary", "pdf_url", "html_url"], "primary_keys": ["id"], "primary_key_values": ["R49485"], "units": {}, "query_ms": 0.2506808377802372, "source": "U.S. government sources, plus a few identifier registries; each is listed on the methodology page", "source_url": "https://datadawn.org/methodology#data", "license": "Public Domain (U.S. Government data)", "license_url": "https://www.regulations.gov/faq"}