comment_texts: 000051c4e8302879199d90f2428c33718aa772938ccb55674641fd98a679033a

Comment text from the regulations.gov bulk export, decoded, one row per distinct text keyed by the SHA-256 of its bytes (n_comments = how many comments share it). Present only on builds that carry the bulk merge. Served surfaces label text from this table as 'regulations.gov bulk export (markup removed)' and prefer the API channel's text where both exist.

This data as json

body_sha256	comment_text	n_comments	body_cluster_sha
000051c4e8302879199d90f2428c33718aa772938ccb55674641fd98a679033a	I am writing in regard to, Proposed 42 C.F.R. 483.80(a)(1) would provide that the facility must establish an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that must include, at a minimum, a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all patients, staff, volunteers, visitors and other individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement. I am an Administrator in a long term care facility and have significant concern about the burden this will place on my facility with regard to meeting this expectation. Although we do have an infection control program, it is unreasonable to believe we can manage infection control for any individual who comes into our facility. These proposal add additional pressure to our facilities that are already burdened by a multitude of regulations. They would only serve to add to those burdens and take us further away from the true nature of our business which is tacking care of our patients.	1	8dd2102f6558f28fbe308d8dafb570b3a5fce40e0071a3dc46f0ae9dfd0d180d