comment_collisions: 4
This data as json
| rowid | id | occurrence | disposition | tracking_number | posted_date | is_withdrawn | title | comment_text | reason_withdrawn | attachment_files | content_files | duplicate_comments | source_slice |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | FAA-1999-6717-0154 | 1 | union_alias | 80382e2e | 2007-09-25T04:00:00Z | 0 | Larry J. Ross | In the comments under Passenger Recovery Plans in the final rule for ETOPS the FAA states: "A plan depending on long-term use of the airplane hull to protect passengers and crew from the elements is not considered acceptable". In the proposed AC, under Passenger Recovery Plan it states: "If the certificate holder proposes to use the airplane capabilities and services as a means to satisfy all or part of the requirements for such a plan...." This appears to be a contradiction. | FAA-2007:2007-01-01:2007-12-31 |