lobbying_filings_raw: c62a041c-5c69-4430-a0e7-6f555dc6bc74
Data license: Public Domain (U.S. Government data) · Data source: Federal Register API & Regulations.gov API
This data as json
| filing_uuid | filing_type | registrant_id | registrant_name | client_id | client_name | filing_year | filing_period | received_date | is_amendment | is_no_activity | is_termination | raw_json | registrant_state | registrant_country | registrant_house_id | client_state | client_ppb_state | client_country | client_ppb_country | client_general_description | client_government_entity | affiliated_org_count | client_entity_id | client_government_unit_id | client_match_method | client_match_confidence | income_amount | expense_amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c62a041c-5c69-4430-a0e7-6f555dc6bc74 | Q1 | 400711131 | NORTHEASTERN RETIAL LUMBER ASSOCIATION | 194492 | NORTHEASTERN RETIAL LUMBER ASSOCIATION | 2017 | first_quarter | 2017-04-06T15:56:29.837000-04:00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | {"url": "https://lda.senate.gov/api/v1/filings/c62a041c-5c69-4430-a0e7-6f555dc6bc74/", "filing_uuid": "c62a041c-5c69-4430-a0e7-6f555dc6bc74", "filing_type": "Q1", "filing_type_display": "1st Quarter - Report", "filing_year": 2017, "filing_period": "first_quarter", "filing_period_display": "1st Quarter (Jan 1 - Mar 31)", "filing_document_url": "https://lda.senate.gov/filings/public/filing/c62a041c-5c69-4430-a0e7-6f555dc6bc74/print/", "filing_document_content_type": "text/html", "income": null, "expenses": null, "expenses_method": "a", "expenses_method_display": "Method A - Reporting amounts using LDA definitions only", "posted_by_name": "Jeffrey Keller", "dt_posted": "2017-04-06T15:56:29.837000-04:00", "termination_date": null, "registrant_country": "United States of America", "registrant_ppb_country": null, "registrant_address_1": "585 North Greenbush Road", "registrant_address_2": null, "registrant_different_address": false, "registrant_city": "Rensselaer", "registrant_state": "NY", "registrant_zip": "12144", "registrant": {"id": 400711131, "url": "https://lda.senate.gov/api/v1/registrants/400711131/", "house_registrant_id": 41563, "name": "NORTHEASTERN RETIAL LUMBER ASSOCIATION", "description": "Retail Lumber Member Association", "address_1": "585 North Greenbush Road", "address_2": null, "address_3": null, "address_4": null, "city": "Rensselaer", "state": "NY", "state_display": "New York", "zip": "12144", "country": "US", "country_display": "United States of America", "ppb_country": "US", "ppb_country_display": "United States of America", "contact_name": "JEFFREY KELLER", "contact_telephone": "+1 518-880-6367", "dt_updated": "2022-04-06T16:07:02.204681-04:00"}, "client": {"id": 194492, "url": "https://lda.senate.gov/api/v1/clients/194492/", "client_id": 12, "name": "NORTHEASTERN RETIAL LUMBER ASSOCIATION", "general_description": null, "client_government_entity": false, "client_self_select": true, "state": "NY", "state_display": "New York", "country": "US", "country_display": "United States of America", "ppb_state": "NY", "ppb_state_display": "New York", "ppb_country": "US", "ppb_country_display": "United States of America", "effective_date": "2011-02-21"}, "lobbying_activities": [{"general_issue_code": "TAX", "general_issue_code_display": "Taxation/Internal Revenue Code", "description": "H.R. 516 - Tax Benefit for Homeownership Clarification Act- Would amend the Internal Revenue Code to reduce the limitation on the mortgage interest deduction for the acquisition indebtedness of certain taxpayers. (Acquisition indebtedness is indebtedness that: (1) is incurred in acquiring, constructing, or substantially improving any qualified residence of the taxpayer; and (2) is secured by such residence. It also includes refinancing of the debt in certain situations.)\n\nH.R. 948 - Common Sense Housing Investment Act of 2017 - Would amend the Internal Revenue Code, with respect to the tax deduction for mortgage interest, to: (1) allow, in lieu of such deduction, a tax credit for 15% of mortgage interest paid in a taxable year for the taxpayer's principal residence and one other residence; (2) provide for a phaseout of the tax deduction for mortgage interest between 2017 and 2021; (3) allow a deduction for interest and taxes relating to land for dwelling purposes owned or leased by cooperative housing corporations; and (4) increase the state housing credit ceiling for the low-income housing tax credit.\n\nH.R. 631 - Death Tax Repeal Act of 2017 -Would amend the Internal Revenue Code to: (1) repeal the estate and generation-skipping transfer taxes, and (2) make permanent the maximum 35% gift tax rate and the lifetime gift tax exemption. The bill provides for an inflation adjustment to such exemption amount.\n\nS. 205 - Death Tax Repeal Act of 2017 - Would amend the Internal Revenue Code to: (1) repeal the estate and generation-skipping transfer taxes, and (2) make permanent the maximum 35% gift tax rate and the lifetime gift tax exemption. The bill also provides for an inflation adjustment to such exemption amount.", "foreign_entity_issues": "", "lobbyists": [{"lobbyist": {"id": 54231, "prefix": "mr", "prefix_display": "MR.", "first_name": "JEFFREY", "nickname": null, "middle_name": "BRETT", "last_name": "KELLER", "suffix": null, "suffix_display": null}, "covered_position": null, "new": false}], "government_entities": [{"id": 49, "name": "Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)"}, {"id": 2, "name": "HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES"}, {"id": 1, "name": "SENATE"}, {"id": 90, "name": "Small Business Administration (SBA)"}]}, {"general_issue_code": "SMB", "general_issue_code_display": "Small Business", "description": "H.R. 5 - Regulatory Accountability Act of 2017 - Would revise federal rulemaking procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) to require a federal agency to make all preliminary and final factual determinations based on evidence and to consider: (1) the legal authority under which a rule may be proposed; (2) the specific nature and significance of the problem the agency may address with a rule; (3) whether existing rules have created or contributed to the problem the agency may address with a rule and whether such rules may be amended or rescinded; (4) any reasonable alternatives for a new rule; and (5) the potential costs and benefits associated with potential alternative rules, including impacts on low-income populations.\n\nH.R. 33 - Small Business Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act of 2017 - Would modify the rulemaking requirements and procedures of federal agencies (excluding Congress, U.S. courts, U.S. territories and possessions, and the District of Columbia) under the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) and the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). The definition of \"rule\" under the RFA is expanded to include all agency rules, except for: (1) rules that pertain to the protection of the rights of and benefits for veterans or that impose limitations on the cost and terms of consumer credit extended to service members and their dependents, or (2) rules of particular (and not general) applicability relating to rates, wages, and other financial indicators. Under a new definition of \"economic impact,\" agencies are required to consider any direct economic effect of a proposed rule on small entities and any indirect economic effect on small entities that is reasonably foreseeable and that results from such rule.\n\nH.R. 469 - Sunshine for Regulations and Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act of 2017 - Would establish public notice and comment procedures and motion to intervene standards for civil actions seeking to compel agency action and alleging that an agency is unlawfully withholding or unreasonably delaying an agency action, and for consent decrees or settlement agreements that require agency action, relating to a regulatory action that would affect the rights of: (1) private persons other than the person bringing the action; or (2) a state, local, or tribal government.\n\nThe bill sets forth requirements for: agencies against which such an action is brought to publish online, within 15 days after receipt, the notice of intent to sue and the complaint; courts to consider motions to intervene and allow amicus participation; and any settlement proceedings to include intervening parties and to be conducted pursuant to the mediation or alternative dispute resolution program of the court or by a district judge. Agencies seeking to enter such a consent decree or settlement agreement must: publish, and accept and respond to public comment on, the proposed agreement or decree for 60 days before filing it with the court; and make available to the court the administrative record and a summary of public comments and any public hearings.\n\nS. 119 - Sunshine for Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act of 2017 - Would establish public notice and comment procedures and motion to intervene standards for civil actions seeking to compel agency action and alleging that an agency is unlawfully withholding or unreasonably delaying an agency action, and for consent decrees or settlement agreements that require agency action, relating to a regulatory action that would affect the rights of: (1) private persons other than the person bringing the action; or (2) a state, local, or tribal government.\n\nThe bill sets forth requirements for: agencies against which such an action is brought to publish online, within 15 days after receipt, the notice of intent to sue and the complaint; courts to consider motions to intervene and allow amicus participation; and any settlement proceedings to include intervening parties and to be conducted pursuant to the mediation or alternative dispute resolution program of the court or by a district judge. Agencies seeking to enter such a consent decree or settlement agreement must: publish, and accept and respond to public comment on, the proposed agreement or decree for 60 days before filing it with the court; and make available to the court the administrative record and a summary of public comments and any public hearings.", "foreign_entity_issues": "", "lobbyists": [{"lobbyist": {"id": 54231, "prefix": "mr", "prefix_display": "MR.", "first_name": "JEFFREY", "nickname": null, "middle_name": "BRETT", "last_name": "KELLER", "suffix": null, "suffix_display": null}, "covered_position": null, "new": false}], "government_entities": [{"id": 49, "name": "Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)"}, {"id": 2, "name": "HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES"}, {"id": 1, "name": "SENATE"}, {"id": 90, "name": "Small Business Administration (SBA)"}]}, {"general_issue_code": "CSP", "general_issue_code_display": "Consumer Issues/Safety/Products", "description": "H.R. 1118 - Innocent Sellers Fairness Act - Exempts a lawful seller from liability for personal injury, monetary loss, or damage to property arising out of an accident or transaction involving a seller's products, unless the claimant proves one or more of the following activities by the seller: the seller was the manufacturer or participated in the design or installation of the product; the seller altered, modified, or expressly warranted the product in a manner not authorized by the manufacturer; the seller had actual knowledge of the defect in the product as a result of a recall from the manufacturer or governmental entity authorized to make such recall or actual inspection at the time the seller sold the product to the claimant; the seller had actual knowledge of the defect in the product at the time the seller supplied the product; the seller intentionally altered or modified a product warranty, warning, or instruction from the manufacturer in a way not authorized by the manufacturer; or the seller knowingly made a false representation about an aspect of the product not authorized by the manufacturer.\n\nLimits the seller's liability to the personal injury, monetary loss, or damage to property directly caused by such activity where a claimant proves one or more of such activities was negligent.\n\nH.R. 720 - Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act of 2017 - amends the sanctions provisions in Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to require the court to impose an appropriate sanction on any attorney, law firm, or party that has violated, or is responsible for the violation of, the rule with regard to representations to the court. Requires any sanction to compensate parties injured by the conduct in question.\nRemoves a provision that prohibits filing a motion for sanctions if the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention, or denial is withdrawn or appropriately corrected within 21 days after service or within another time the court sets.\nAuthorizes the court to impose additional sanctions, including striking the pleadings, dismissing the suit, nonmonetary directives, or penalty payments if warranted for effective deterrence.\n\nS. 237 - Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act of 2017 - amends the sanctions provisions in Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to require the court to impose an appropriate sanction on any attorney, law firm, or party that has violated, or is responsible for the violation of, the rule with regard to representations to the court. Requires any sanction to compensate parties injured by the conduct in question.\nRemoves a provision that prohibits filing a motion for sanctions if the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention, or denial is withdrawn or appropriately corrected within 21 days after service or within another time the court sets.\nAuthorizes the court to impose additional sanctions, including striking the pleadings, dismissing the suit, nonmonetary directives, or penalty payments if warranted for effective deterrence.", "foreign_entity_issues": "", "lobbyists": [{"lobbyist": {"id": 54231, "prefix": "mr", "prefix_display": "MR.", "first_name": "JEFFREY", "nickname": null, "middle_name": "BRETT", "last_name": "KELLER", "suffix": null, "suffix_display": null}, "covered_position": null, "new": false}], "government_entities": [{"id": 49, "name": "Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)"}, {"id": 2, "name": "HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES"}, {"id": 1, "name": "SENATE"}, {"id": 90, "name": "Small Business Administration (SBA)"}]}, {"general_issue_code": "ENV", "general_issue_code_display": "Environment/Superfund", "description": "Lobbying Congress and the EPA concerning the Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program (LRRP) Rule. Asking that they examine reforms to the rule due to the lack of a properly functioning lead paint remediation test kit.", "foreign_entity_issues": "", "lobbyists": [{"lobbyist": {"id": 54231, "prefix": "mr", "prefix_display": "MR.", "first_name": "JEFFREY", "nickname": null, "middle_name": "BRETT", "last_name": "KELLER", "suffix": null, "suffix_display": null}, "covered_position": null, "new": false}], "government_entities": [{"id": 49, "name": "Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)"}, {"id": 2, "name": "HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES"}, {"id": 1, "name": "SENATE"}, {"id": 90, "name": "Small Business Administration (SBA)"}]}], "conviction_disclosures": [], "foreign_entities": [], "affiliated_organizations": []} | NY | US | 41563 | NY | NY | US | US | 0 | 0 |